The Indiefield Blog

We all fail and successful people actually fail more than most. So the two things you need to do is first, stop avoiding the blame and throwing shade on others, and second, you need to make sure you sign up for the high profile and scarily important projects. Here are some tips that will help you fail your way to success:

1. Take on the tough projects and assignments
2. Know what a successful outcome looks like and promise everyone you will get there
3. Get as many people involved as you can so you work as a team towards success
4. Know for certain what can go wrong so you actively avoid the pitfalls
5. Focus on the parts of the project that you can have an effect on and ignore the elements that you have no control over
6. When you fail (and you will) own it, call it a failure and note down what you learned so it is not repeated
7. Never blame others for failure. People who do that don't grow.

If these tips scare you, you are getting somewhere.

Companies and resources that are owned by private individuals or entities who are free to trade contracts with each other ultimately leads to increased efficiency, greater production, and a plethora of innovation. But success leads companies to protect their assets and investments by doing everything to make their market "un-free". Locking in patents, long term pricing and building barriers to entry in order to safeguard their balance sheet. Such thinking is up against technology, forced transparency and more sophisticated consumers with regulation on their side. In the short term the monopoly seeking entity is more effective. But in the long term the free market will always win.

We all know that developers, designers and artists do their best work when left alone to get into the flow and stay well away from the humdrum of organisational management. No clockwatching, no meetings, no stress from project demands. Our creative people need to be protected from all sorts of wasteful nonsense. Managers need to think more about what it is to be a creative because we all know that creating things is more difficult than it ever was before. And most managers would probably benefit from a bit of isolation to do the truly challenging tasks before them. But the creatives amongst us need to learn to behave more like a manager. If they don't they are ultimately side lined and get cut out of the big decisions within an organisation. Neither creatives or managers insist their way is the best way, but nothing will be brought into the world if they don't fully co-operate.

There are times in our lives when we have very little information upon which to make a decision – sometimes there's absolutely no information and nothing but the hum of a white noise machine. And yet still you have to make a decision. So you can use your experience, your intelligence, you might even try and tap into metaphysics and the principle governing all things! But occasionally all you can do is toss a coin. If you want to make sure you're right do best of three. If there is not enough data, or there cannot be enough data, insist on a coin toss. At least that way you can save yourself hours of pontificating and admit to yourself that you are winging it.

The thing about lionising successful people is that we only ever remember the successful things they did and completely forget all the ideas and ventures they had that failed. A great example of it is Oprah Winfrey who has a long history of failed shows, abandoned projects, and plans that never came to fruition. But we all know how well respected by the market and loved by society at large she is. We simply don't track any of the failures. And neither should you when you think about yourself.

These are the two options available to most of us:

1. You are ideal. Everything is always on time, your documents contain no typos, you deliver flawlessly and you complete every task efficiently.
2. You are fascinating. You shake things up and deliver outstanding products and services that blow people out of the water.

How many staff should answer their phone on a Saturday? What's the policy regarding postponement and cancellation? How quickly following the end of the fieldwork are the respondents paid? Can I contact the people who took part in my study? How many steps from the train station to the research venue?

Three quick tips for anyone who cares about this:

1. Think carefully about the individuals experience at every touch point.
2. Run through the process from the "other side" and call out what needs to improve.
3. Make it easy for feedback from every possible angle so that you can make things better for everyone you interact with.

Pine nuts are served by the handful and it's literally impossible to check everyone so a bad tasting pine nut can ruin a whole mouthful. A pineapple is different. You pick it up and smell it and if you don't like it you can simply choose another pineapple. If you are selling pineapples the goal is to make your pineapples the best that there is. If you are selling pine nuts the goal is to get a uniform size and shape and eliminate all defects. Pineapples are about looking and smelling great and appealing to the individual. Pineapple buyers get to choose! The pine nut producers needs to focus on statistical - and data-driven processes like Six Sigma to limit mistakes or defects.

From a very early age we are taught how to behave towards people in authority. By the time we get to school the emphasis is on being 'good student' and that translates into "being a good employee". But in many ways this can lead to being "safe" and never challenging the way things are done because a) you don't want to rock the boat and b) there is a risk of failure so all your "good employee" kudos is lost. But does this truly help your boss? Isn't the truth that maximising what you do as opposed to minimizing and being safe the only way you can raise the bar? You might fail, you might get reprimanded, but if you want real growth you need to see those in authority as resources not limits.

We either ignore brands or we judge them, and most of the time with hardly any information. A good brand has a laser like focus, knows exactly who its target audience is, has a clearly defined mission, knows its USP, can identify its key values, tell its story from the beginning and have a brand identity reflective of these goals, and does all of this consistently. Seems so obvious. What is less obvious is an in built ability to discipline, ostracise or even expel the negative within. A good brand will fight not to get hurt from both within and without. "You're hurting us, this is wrong, we are expelling you."